Award for Excellence in Human Research Protection
Best Practice 2005

Family Health International, Research Triangle Park, NC

Submitted by: Dr. Roberto Rivera, Director, Office of International Research Ethics

 

The following information was submitted by the applicant for the award. The Institute may have edited the text for presentation purposes. Health Improvement Institute has not verified, and does not guarantee, the completeness or accuracy of the information for any purpose. Institutions interested in adopting or adapting the practice would be well advised to contact the person who submitted the application and to evaluate this and any additional information for their purposes.

Description: In 2004 Family Health International (FHI) published the Research Ethics Training Curriculum for Community Representatives (RETC-CR), an educational tool for preparing and informing community representatives about research ethics, so that they can fulfill their roles and responsibilities and have a stronger voice in the planning, implementation and dissemination stages of the research process.  The curriculum was developed for training representatives of the communities in which research is being conducted, serving as members of the research team, a Community Advisory Board (CAB) or a Research Ethics Committee. The curriculum was specifically designed to empower community representatives in developing countries to have an active participation throughout the research process. An earlier curriculum, the Research Ethics Training Curriculum (RETC), was developed by FHI in 2001. The RETC, an educational tool for instructing research staff in the principles of basic human subjects research ethics, was designed for training international researchers based in developing countries. Both are online at http://www.fhi.org/en/RH/Training/trainmat/ethicscurr/index.htm.

 

Genesis: Current regulations do not address the role of community in the research process.  The attempt to involve host communities in research is an idea that is still in its infancy, but FHI believes that this will become a global expectation.  Having materials like the curriculum for community representatives will facilitate the growth and development of this trend.


Experience:  The Research Ethics Training Curriculum for Community Representatives has been used by research staff to train Community Advisory Board (CAB) members associated with specific research projects in Africa, Asia and Latin America. In addition, data from FHI’s web site show that the RETC-CR has been viewed more than 167,000 times by more than 8,000 visitors and downloaded as a pdf file 5,383 times.  The earlier curriculum, the RETC, has also become widely used by international organizations including the World Health Organization (WHO), the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), and members of the Pan-African Bioethics Initiative (PABIN), Foro Latinoamericano de Comités de Ética en Investigación en Salud (FLACEIS), and the Forum for Ethical Review Committees in Asia & the Western Pacific (FERCAP). The RETC is available in Spanish, French, Chinese, Portuguese, and translation into Swahili is underway.  Data from FHI web site show that the RETC has been visited more than 313,000 times by more than 79,000 visitors from 50 countries, and downloaded as a pdf file more than 10,000 times. In addition, FHI has issued 2,714 certificates of successful course completion to individuals from 59 countries.


Compliance: In 1999 the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced a requirement that key research personnel would be required to obtain education in basic research ethics.  Also, several internationally prominent organizations — including the Council for International Organizations of Medical Science (CIOMS) and the Nuffield Council on Bioethics —made explicit recommendations encouraging all researchers to complete a basic training program on the ethics of research involving human subjects.  At the time of the NIH announcement, FHI’s Office of International Research Ethics (OIRE) initiated an evaluation of selected research ethics training curricula that were available at that time and found that these curricula were mostly designed to meet specific institutional and U.S. regulatory requirements and were not appropriate for an international audience. FHI determined these need for ethics training materials would be best served by new materials developed to meet the unique needs of its global audience.  The RETC and RETC-CR curricula were the result of these efforts.


Protection of human subjects: The RETC contributes toward the achievement of protection of human subjects through the professional development of individuals responsible for the design, conduct, review and analysis of research involving human subjects.  For many of the individuals completing the curriculum, the exposure to the RETC is the first exposure to the principles of research ethics.  The RETC contributes to a culture in which research is designed and conducted according to the highest ethical standards.

Monitoring and evaluation/outcomes: The development of the RETC-CR included an initial internal review, followed by an international external review and a series of field-tests, to ensure wide applicability of ethical practices and curriculum content.  The field tests were conducted in eight countries by HIV prevention research community educators working with Community Advisory Boards in Brazil, China, India, Malawi, Tanzania, U.S., Zambia and Zimbabwe.  The RETC was also field-tested, and has been evaluated through ongoing monitoring of evaluations by course participants and feedback from instructors in the field. Feedback from course participants indicate they often consider establishing a research ethics committee, or updating one already established. FHI has evidence of new Standard Operating Procedures having been developed as a result of trainings conducted for members of ethics committees of national relevance in Guatemala, Malawi, Panama, Peru and Zambia. To date, FHI has observed a diverse group of institutions electing to use the RETC as an instructional tool.  The group includes, among many others, colleges and universities (Harvard University, University of Zambia), academic medical centers (Chiang Mai University, Malawi College of Medicine), government agencies (US Centers for Disease Control, China Center for Disease Control, Ethiopia Ministry of Health), non-governmental organizations (The Population Council), research institutions (International Programs Assistance Services in the US, Nigerian Institute for Medical Research), and research networks (HIV Prevention Trials Network).  It is notable that among the universities that have used the RETC, several have existing institutionalized mandated training with their own curricula, but use the RETC for their international research sites. 

Innovation: The RETC-CR is innovative in its focus on the communities from which participants are recruited. To our knowledge there is no other comparable training tool.

Replicability: The RETC-CR and RETC can be used by a broad spectrum of individuals and institutions from individual principal investigators to research networks to entire institutions.

Applicant’s justification for award: The need to include community representatives throughout the research process has been increasingly recognized. However, community participation approaches in research are fragmented and have suffered from inadequate attention to consistent guidance.  Geographic, cultural, political and social differences impact on the operationalization and integration of community participation into the science at the local level. Research and ethics literacy in resource constrained communities involves multiple challenges, including a concerted investment in training and capacity building, as these communities are often characterized by major disparities; and community representatives may have little formal education.  Of equal importance is community literacy of researchers, as evidenced by the degree of investment in the partnership process, including efforts to overcome perceived power / educational imbalances. To our knowledge the RECT-CR is currently the only available tool designed to meet this kind of training. In addition, the RETC-CR is available on FHI’s Web site and on CD-ROMs in English, French and Spanish. Chinese and Portuguese versions will be available early in 2006.

For additional information: Dr. Roberto Rivera
Tel:   919-544-7040, ext 233
Fax:  919-544-7261
Email: ethics@fhi.org